diff options
author | NRK <nrk@disroot.org> | 2022-03-18 17:03:34 +0600 |
---|---|---|
committer | Hiltjo Posthuma <hiltjo@codemadness.org> | 2022-03-18 12:20:27 +0100 |
commit | ef0551932fb162f907b40185d2f48c3b497708ee (patch) | |
tree | 7051a47cfe413c345ca707d3550be21e00081556 /LICENSE%25253fid%25253df5b5452eac468760c2972daf184f18e16f03d1ff%253fid%253dbaa9357e96d2478baa52a3301e70ac80a229b726%3fid%3d8629d9a1da72cc18568a8f146307b0e939b77ebf?id=ef0551932fb162f907b40185d2f48c3b497708ee | |
parent | af3bb68add1c40d19d0dee382009e21b0870a38f (diff) |
base64_digits: reduce scope, implicit zero, +1 size
the array is not accessed outside of base64dec() so it makes sense to
limit it's scope to the related function. the static-storage duration of
the array is kept intact.
this also removes unnecessary explicit zeroing from the start and end of
the array. anything that wasn't explicitly zero-ed will now be
implicitly zero-ed instead.
the validity of the new array can be easily confirmed via running this
trivial loop:
for (int i = 0; i < 255; ++i)
assert(base64_digits[i] == base64_digits_old[i]);
lastly, as pointed out by Roberto, the array needs to have 256 elements
in order to able access it as any unsigned char as an index; the
previous array had 255.
however, this array will only be accessed at indexes which are
isprint() || '=' (see `base64dec_getc()`), so reducing the size of the
array to the highest printable ascii char (127 AFAIK) + 1 might also be
a valid strategy.
Diffstat (limited to 'LICENSE%25253fid%25253df5b5452eac468760c2972daf184f18e16f03d1ff%253fid%253dbaa9357e96d2478baa52a3301e70ac80a229b726%3fid%3d8629d9a1da72cc18568a8f146307b0e939b77ebf?id=ef0551932fb162f907b40185d2f48c3b497708ee')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions